Looping

Discipline: Applicable in all subjects as a means of teaching students how to practice deep listening. Particularly useful as preparation for curriculum and content that encourages discussion and debate. This activity provides good practice with low-stakes public speaking and highlights the value of active listening as a key skill for understanding and collaboration.

Age level: Grade 3-12

Time: 20 minutes

Materials: A timer.

This activity is built upon the work of Amanda Ripley and her book High Conflict: Why We Get Trapped and How We Get Out. In the book, she explores several effective strategies people have used to de-escalate high conflict situations, and not surprisingly, deep listening is essential in every instance. The deceptively simple practice of “looping” – listening to understand, not just to respond, helps us get curious about other people’s perspectives and experiences – a critical skill for all members of a society.

What to do: 

Begin by asking students to think about something they have a strong opinion about – ideally, an opinion that they know not everyone shares. Depending on the age and content area you work with, these opinions can be low stakes, like “dodgeball is the best game to play at recess,” or higher stakes, like “high schools should do a better job of offering job counseling and not just college counseling.” 

Instruct students to choose a topic they could talk about for 2 minutes straight without interruption. If your students are very comfortable with conversation, they may not need to prepare for these two minutes, but if they need some scaffolding, you can have them write down a list of talking points (encourage them to come up with at least 20, they will struggle to list that many but this will help them be sure to fill the 2 minutes).

Pair students and have them choose who will be A and who will be B. 

Explain: 

We are going to practice a deep listening technique called “looping”. In this practice, one of you will speak for two minutes straight about this topic for which you have a strong opinion. You must speak for the full two minutes. 

Your partner will listen very, very closely for those full two minutes. Listening partners are going to pay such close attention that after the two minutes are up, they can say back everything they have heard as precisely as possible. So, listeners, you are ONLY paying attention to what your speaker has to say. You are not thinking of your opinion on this topic. You are not thinking of follow-up questions; you are just trying to listen and remember all you are hearing. 

After the speaker is done. The listener says back everything they heard. The most important part of their job comes after they’ve said everything they can remember. They then say to the speaker: 

DID I GET THAT RIGHT?

This is a critical step, and now the speaker has an even more important job, which is to correct the listener and clarify any parts they misunderstood. To be fully understood as people, we must get better at this step. In looping, the speaker has a responsibility to make sure the listener gets it right. Don’t be shy about making these corrections! 

After the speaker makes corrections, the listener tries again. After this redo, they again say: 

DID I GET THAT RIGHT? 

And they keep trying until they do. 

Then, we will switch roles. 

Any questions? 

Use a timer to keep track of the two-minute speaker portions. The listener’s replay portions typically take less time, and depending on how well they listened, they may not have to do much repeating. 

If partners finish early in the first round, encourage listeners to ask follow-up questions once they have correctly said back what they heard. 

Once everyone has completed the first round, have partners swap roles, and now the prior listener shares their two-minute talk, and the prior speaker does the replay. 

Debrief

After both partners have spoken and listened, debrief with the class about what they learned:

  • What did you notice about yourself as either a speaker or a listener?
  • Which was harder for you? Why? 
  • What does this activity make you think about how you show up for conversations? 
  • Are there people in your life who you know would be exceptionally good at the listening part? Who are they? What do they do that leads you to think this? 
  • What was it like to really listen before responding? 
  • How did it feel to share opinions that might be different from those of your peers? 
  • What will you remember most from this experience?

 

Standards Addressed by this Activity

Common Core College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Language

Knowledge of Language:

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.L.3 Apply knowledge of language to understand how language functions in different contexts, to make effective choices for meaning or style, and to comprehend more fully when reading or listening.

Vocabulary Acquisition and Use:

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.L.4 Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases by using context clues, analyzing meaningful word parts, and consulting general and specialized reference materials, as appropriate.

 

Common Core College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Speaking and Listening

Comprehension and Collaboration:

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.1 Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.2 Integrate and evaluate information presented in diverse media and formats, including visually, quantitatively, and orally.

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.3 Evaluate a speaker’s point of view, reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric.

Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas:

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.4 Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.CCRA.SL.6 Adapt speech to a variety of contexts and communicative tasks, demonstrating command of formal English when indicated or appropriate.

Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice

Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

CCSS.MATH.PRACTICE.MP3 Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They are able to analyze situations by breaking them into cases, and can recognize and use counterexamples. They justify their conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and—if there is a flaw in an argument—explain what it is. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not generalized or made formal until later grades. Later, students learn to determine domains to which an argument applies. Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments.

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning Competencies

Self-Awareness: The abilities to understand one’s own emotions, thoughts, and values and how they influence behavior across contexts. This includes capacities to recognize one’s strengths and limitations with a well-grounded sense of confidence and purpose.

Self-management: The abilities to manage one’s emotions, thoughts, and behaviors effectively in different situations and to achieve goals and aspirations. This includes the capacities to delay gratification, manage stress, and feel motivation and agency to accomplish personal and collective goals.

Social awareness: The abilities to understand the perspectives of and empathize with others, including those from diverse backgrounds, cultures, and contexts. This includes the capacities to feel compassion for others, understand broader historical and social norms for behavior in different settings, and recognize family, school, and community resources and supports.

Responsible decision-making: The abilities to make caring and constructive choices about personal behavior and social interactions across diverse situations. This includes the capacities to consider ethical standards and safety concerns, and to evaluate the benefits and consequences of various actions for personal, social, and collective well-being.

Relationship skills: The abilities to establish and maintain healthy and supportive relationships and to effectively navigate settings with diverse individuals and groups. This includes the capacities to communicate clearly, listen actively, cooperate, work collaboratively to problem solve and negotiate conflict constructively, navigate settings with differing social and cultural demands and opportunities, provide leadership, and seek or offer help when needed.

College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards

Dimension 1: Developing Questions and Planning Inquiries Dimension 3: Evaluating Sources and Using Evidence Dimension 4: Communicating Conclusions and Taking Informed Action
Developing Questions and Planning Inquiries Gathering and Evaluating Sources Communicating and Critiquing Conclusions
Developing Claims and Using Evidence Taking Informed Action